Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Approved Not made | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Rejected | 01 | 01 | 02 |
Total | 05 | 01 | 06 |
Lowest Income: | $35,448 | Highest Income: | $120,000 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$296,100 | 04 | $74,025 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 | 00 | 02 | 04 |
Percentage of Loans | 0% | 0% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 04 | 100% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 04 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
Partnership Loans | 04 | $165,109 |
Total | 04 | $165,109 |
Lowest | 3% |
---|---|
Highest | 4% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
12 | 04 | 3% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 04 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 04 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 01 | $5,368 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 04 | $159,741 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 05 | $165,109 |
Number Loans in default | 00 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
When a grandmother in her late fifty’s became the guardian for three grandchildren, challenges in everyday life increased. One grandchild was 12 years old with Tracheomalacia and Succinic Semialdehyde Dehydrogenase Deficiency, a disability like Cerebral Palsy. This child was nearly 200 pounds, used a wheelchair and required 24-hour care. The grandmother described the difficulty of getting the girl to her regular doctors’ appointments. She said, “We live in a mobile home, and I have to have 2 or 3 of my family members come over to lift her and her chair down from the home and put her in the back seat of my car”. She continued, “They follow me to the doctors’ office and help unload her, wait, and then reload her and follow us home to lift her back up the porch and into the home.” Working with the NMTAP State Financing staff, she was able to install a wheelchair ramp to the home and obtain a used accessible van for transportation. The cost of the ramp and the purchase of the van were obtained through a single financial loan at a fixed rate of 2.55% for a term of 72 months. This payment fit nicely into her budget and addressed her family’s concerns. The grandmother is now able to take her grandchild to all medical appointments by herself. She also is excited to “easily include the girl in regular outings and family functions away from the home”.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 04 | 100% |
Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 04 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 969 |
C. Total | 969 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 969 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 557 | $253,625 | $0 | $253,625 |
Daily Living | 1,136 | $126,398 | $0 | $126,398 |
Environmental Adaptations | 12 | $4,335 | $0 | $4,335 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 150 | $45,025 | $0 | $45,025 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 | $500 | $0 | $500 |
Total | 1,856 | $429,883 | $0 | $429,883 |
The NMTAP Back In Use program had 82-year-old women come in looking for a walker with big terrain tires to navigate the uneven ground around her home and neighborhood. She is paralyzed on her left side due to a stroke and is working with a Physical Therapist (PT) to regain her independence. Her physical therapist advised her to get a walker with larger wider tires for safety but her Medicaid provider denied the request, stating a standard walker should meet the needs. She is a senior with a low fixed income and unable to afford a walker. The NMTAP reuse staff were able to modify a standard walker with the purchase of appropriate big wheels and adjusted it with the PT to work for her. She is very happy to be able to enjoy the outdoors with her walker. She stated that her life has changed and is happy to be more independent.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 834 | 31 | 29 | 894 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 18 | 09 | 14 | 41 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 24 | 07 | 02 | 33 |
4. Subtotal | 876 | 47 | 45 | 968 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 876 | 47 | 45 | 968 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
8. Total | 877 | 47 | 45 | 969 |
9. Performance on this measure | 99.89% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 923 | 95.25% |
Satisfied | 25 | 2.58% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 21 | 2.17% |
Total Surveyed | 969 | |
Response rate % | 97.83% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 150 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 03 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 05 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 02 |
Total | 160 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 82 | 05 | 87 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 05 | 03 | 08 |
Representative of Education | 19 | 01 | 20 |
Representative of Employment | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 40 | 01 | 41 |
Representatives of Community Living | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 150 | 10 | 160 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 42 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 25 | 00 | 25 |
Hearing | 09 | 02 | 11 |
Speech Communication | 45 | 04 | 49 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 81 | 02 | 83 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 25 | 02 | 27 |
Daily Living | 43 | 04 | 47 |
Environmental Adaptations | 09 | 03 | 12 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Computers and Related | 86 | 05 | 91 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Total | 325 | 22 | 347 |
Hal K is a living in a rural area of the state was out of work due to a year of surgeries and healing. He was looking to get back to work and is teaming with the vocational rehabilitation (VR) program for job placement. One of the biggest struggles in seeking employment was having dyslexia. Hal cannot read above a fourth-grade level, and finds reading manuals, policies and procedures, and other workplace documents challenging. When he and his VR counselor originally sought help from the NMTAP, they requested to borrow a CPEN Reader scanning pen to have scanned text read back to him. This CPEN technology was simply too slow for his needs, since it is a pen that reads each word as the user traces the pen along one sentence at a time. The NMTAP staff member suggested the OrCam Read, which can scan an entire page’s text and read that text aloud to the user as a handheld device controlled using physical buttons. Unfortunately, the only available device at the time with the same capacity was the OrCam’s MyEye 2 vision tool, which can read back a full document from a camera attached to a pair of glasses using hand gestures for control. While this device was not the ideal, he borrowed it until the OrCam Read was available. The benefit of this was that he learned the basics of OrCam’s system. After then borrowing the handheld OrCam Read, Hal K said it was wonderful, straight out of the box. He did not have difficulty setting up the device and he said it will be a true working tool for him when he finds a job. Currently, the VR program will not purchase the OrCam Read for him until he has a job first. Due to the device loan program, he has knowledge and access to the right tool with the exact features he needs for success. He also knows other AT is available to him while
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 38 | 12 | 36 | 86 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 10 | 06 | 14 | 30 |
Subtotal | 48 | 18 | 50 | 116 |
Have not made a decision | 06 | 01 | 10 | 17 |
Subtotal | 54 | 19 | 60 | 133 |
Nonrespondent | 02 | 02 | 13 | 17 |
Total | 56 | 21 | 73 | 150 |
Performance on this measure | 88.89% | 94.74% | 83.33% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 06 | 07 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
4. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 07 | 09 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 07 | 09 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
8. Total | 02 | 01 | 07 | 10 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 111 | 69.38% |
Satisfied | 19 | 11.88% |
Satisfied somewhat | 05 | 3.13% |
Not at all satisfied | 03 | 1.88% |
Nonrespondent | 22 | 13.75% |
Total Surveyed | 160 | |
Response rate % | 86.25% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 13 |
Hearing | 06 |
Speech Communication | 14 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 13 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 03 |
Daily Living | 05 |
Environmental Adaptations | 02 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 04 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 30 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 90 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 72 | 15 | 87 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 05 | 31 | 36 |
Representatives of Education | 04 | 03 | 07 |
Representatives of Employment | 02 | 10 | 12 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 07 | 14 | 21 |
Representative of Community Living | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 02 | 02 |
Total | 90 | 75 | 165 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 02 |
Service Provider | 05 |
Vendor | 10 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 02 |
Total | 19 |
Jonte D is a woman in her early forties who had a stroke about four years ago and in addition to decreased strength on her right side, she also lost her ability to speak clearly. Jonte’s Aunt Dee called NMTAP looking for tools to help Jonte communicate more easily with her family, doctors, and any other person she might communicate with. Jonte uses a smartphone to text message and if you know her well enough, it is possible to understand her communication by watching her gestures and closely listening to her speech. Since Jonte is literate and is proficient with her smartphone, we agreed to try speech communication tools with an iPad. We initially tried the free Tobii Dynavox Application TD Talk, but the interface was far too simple for her needs. We then tried AssistiveWare’s Proloquo4Text’s Application, and there we hit success. Not only were we able to set up contact information and short messages for Jonte to use with her doctors, but Jonte was proficient with using the iPad and application during our demonstration. Proloquo4Text is a powerful application that enables users to quickly type messages that are then converted to speech using built-in voices. For Jonte’s use, having an application that is compatible with both a tablet and smartphone is ideal. I recommended that Jonte get back in touch with her Speech Language Pathologist to pursue purchase of an iPad and Proloquo4Text software. Jonte is also on the Developmental Disabilities Waiver program for New Mexico, and I gave her and Dee an application to use their State Assistive Technology Fund to purchase the AT should her medical team be unable to purchase through insurance. I also informed Jonte and Dee about our Access Loan, which is available for people with disabilities who wish to purchase AT.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 15 | 10 | 57 | 82 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 |
Subtotal | 15 | 11 | 59 | 85 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
Subtotal | 16 | 11 | 60 | 87 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
Total | 16 | 11 | 63 | 90 |
Performance on this measure | 93.75% | 100% | 93.65% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 146 | 88.48% |
Satisfied | 17 | 10.3% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 02 | 1.21% |
Total | 165 | |
Response rate % | 98.79% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 834 | 31 | 33 | 898 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 18 | 10 | 20 | 48 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 25 | 07 | 03 | 35 |
4. Subtotal | 877 | 48 | 56 | 981 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 877 | 48 | 56 | 981 |
7. Nonrespondent | 02 | 00 | 00 | 02 |
8. Total | 879 | 48 | 56 | 983 |
9. Performance on this measure | 97.04% | 85.42% | 94.64% | 96.33% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 53 | 22 | 93 | 168 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 10 | 07 | 16 | 33 |
Subtotal | 63 | 29 | 109 | 201 |
Have not made a decision | 07 | 01 | 11 | 19 |
Subtotal | 70 | 30 | 120 | 220 |
Nonrespondent | 02 | 02 | 16 | 20 |
Total | 72 | 32 | 136 | 240 |
Performance on this measure | 90% | 96.67% | 88.62% | 90.13% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.36% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 96.53% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 72 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 51 |
Representatives of Education | 387 |
Representatives of Employment | 433 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 244 |
Representatives of Community Living | 122 |
Representatives of Technology | 08 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 1,317 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
854 | 463 | 00 | 1,317 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 1,205 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 00 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 92 |
Transition | 20 |
Total | 1,317 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
At the NMTAP annual Assistive Technology Conference (ATC22), two Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) presented on Assistive Technology for Speech Communication and provided personal, and in-depth experience, about what communication is and how to get speech communication devices paid for by the client’s insurance company. This not only provided exposure and awareness for SLP’s in attendance but also for all other professionals as well. This information was much needed by the community because many professionals in our area do not know the steps on where to start and what is needed for insurance coverage for devices.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
NMTAP provided a transition-oriented training at the 2022 Parents Reaching Out Annual Conference. This was their first in-person conference since the COVID-19 Pandemic and NMTAPs first large group in person training since 2020. The training subject was Assistive Technology for Math and Reading for students with disabilities, in particular those transitioning to high school and post-secondary education. A good deal of emphasis was placed on assistive apps and software that students could access on their phones, tablets, or computers. One of the hallmarks of our trainings is to provide a hands-on experience for the present participants which was impossible to do with our virtual trainings. This was the first time we were able to bring back that element to our training and it was beneficial for the participants to get their hands on the assistive technology and see how they work. This conference brings in families, therapists, and persons with disabilities from all over New Mexico and NMTAP has already seen the benefits of this training by having some participants reach out to us for more assistive technology services like device demonstration and device loan.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
NMTAP provided IT/Telecomm Access (ICT) training to the New Mexico Legislative Council (NMLC) regarding website accessibility. NMLC reached out to NMTAP for resources and assistance with website issues and seeking better knowledge on how to make their website experience more accessible for individuals with disabilities. In collaboration with Disability Rights New Mexico, NMTAP gave an ICT training via Zoom. The training, provided to the Director of the Legislative Council Service and his staff, broke down all the pertinent laws for accessible web content, provided examples of disabilities and how they may be affected by an inaccessible website, provided a breakdown of the most common issues and how to fix, and concluded with a breakdown of the necessary tools for the NMLC to assess their own website content. The positive impact of this training has already been reported back to us with their readjusting of their accessibility accommodation announcement and the inclusion of the Recite Me accessible overlay which allows for independent accessible controls over the website. Far from being finished, the NMLC is taking the rights steps to making their website more inclusive to persons with disabilities.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 92 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 92 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 00% |
---|---|
Employment | 00% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00% |
Community Living | 100% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 00% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
NMTAP provided Technical Assistance to the New Mexico Natural History Museum. The initial request was to get a device demonstration on a hearing amplifier for one of their hard of hearing volunteer workers. This turned into a device loan that the consumer used for about six weeks until one was purchased for him to use full time. NMTAP was then able to assist with some other accessibility requests which included testing out the brand-new loop system set up in the planetarium building using a t-coil hearing aid and one of our assistive listening devices. We provided the organization with resources on where to print accessible signage from hearingloop.org and how to appropriately place it outside and inside the building. NMTAP was also able to help troubleshoot possibilities with how multiple assistive listening device receivers could be used in the big theater they have for movies. By patching into the main sound feed, a connection could be made to an assistive listening device set-up wi
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. On April 1st, 2022, NMTAP had an information booth at the DiverseIT 50+ Senior Tech Connect Fair. The purpose of the Tech Fair was to offer older adults the opportunity to explore technology and be educated on how to use the technology. Because this Tech Fair was designed for seniors, it provided a unique opportunity for the senior community to experience new technology and ask questions about technology they already have or are thinking of purchasing. NMTAP had a variety of AT available for the participants to view including digital magnifiers, mobility tools, hearing devices, and assistive eating technology. We were able to connect with approximately 600 seniors from the Metro, Albuquerque area. This tech fair was a collaboration between many local entities including the City of Albuquerque’s Senior Affairs Department, Adelante Development Center’s DiverseIT program, AT&T, Comcast, and AARP Albuquerque.
2.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 88 | 08 | 96 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 29 | 05 | 34 |
Representative of Education | 29 | 04 | 33 |
Representative of Employment | 23 | 01 | 24 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 23 | 00 | 23 |
Representative of Community Living | 12 | 00 | 12 |
Representative of Technology | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Unable to Categorize | 17 | 00 | 17 |
Total | 224 | 18 | 242 |
NMTAP provides training to the University of New Mexico Speech and Hearing Sciences students in the master’s program for Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs). Detailed information and experience with a wide variety of speech generating devices is provided along with full information of NMTAP services. As a result of the training and services review, eight SLPs have returned to borrow devices for their clients after entering the community workforce. There has also been an increase in information and referral calls about speech difficulties, troubleshooting devices and vendors of devices.
NMTAP works with the 22 NM Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR) field offices around the state. Many VR Councilors refer their participants to NMTAP for demonstration and device loan services. Approximately 10-15% of referrals for information and assistance come from these field offices. We also provide services to individuals with disabilities and who are aging from the City of Albuquerque Senior Services program or ADA Coordinator. Individuals that hear about our services from these programs often utilize our information and assistance in which we refer them to resources for home wheelchair ramps and other services. These interactions are approximately 8% of our calls or emails received.
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 1 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
NMTAP has partnered with the Developmental Disabilities Services Division (DDSD) of the NM Department of Health in a beta project to improve access and use of AT for participants. After many interactions and discussions with the DDSD staff on all levels, it became clearer that AT advances for persons receiving services was needed. DDSD funds were used to contract with a national agency, Tech First Shift, that specializes in a curriculum to shift the culture for services for individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD).
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
While services provided to individuals on the DD Waiver, there seems to be a "business as usual" attitude even with some of the therapy services. An initiative was started within the DDSD Community Program Bureau started a pilot project with 9 service providers, 10 vendors of AT, and the NMTAP staff to increase the awareness and value of available AT for independence for waiver participants. This is a project which entails extensive training around a paradigm shift is extending into the next year but has already increased consciousness for all parties. It is anticipated that will lead to an ongoing project using AT services from NMTAP throughout the state.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Housing / Home Automation; Transportation; Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Health;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration; Training;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Federal | $28,050 | Training | True |
Amount: $28,050 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Jan 31 2023 11:11:50 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time)